Page 5 - News VLU 08 2023
P. 5

Vein & Lymphatic University
                                                       VLU voices



























         such  as  digital  subtraction  imaging  and   be done safely during pregnancy if dee-
         magnification, and utilize features such as   med necessary. Confusion surrounding
         lower pulsed fluoroscopy, fluoroscopy loop   radiation exposure during pregnancy often
         saves, and last image store. Adjustments   leads to delays that may increase mortality
         to imaging machinery such as maximizing   and morbidity. In addition, there needs to
         the distance between the source and de-  be an increased effort to quantify the risk
         tector should also be considered.    of potentially life-saving interventions in the
                                    11
                                             pregnant population to improve safety and
           Ultimately, image-guided procedures can   clinical decision making in the future.

          Reference

          1.   ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 196: Thromboembolism   7.   Greer, I. A. & Nelson-Piercy, C. Low-molecular-
             in Pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology 132, e1–e17   weight heparins for thromboprophylaxis and
             (2018).                             treatment of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy:
          2.   Bremme, K. A. Haemostatic changes in pregnancy.   a systematic review of safety and efficacy. Blood
             Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 16, 153–168 (2003).  106, 401–407 (2005).
          3.   Goland, S. & Elkayam, U. Anticoagulation in Preg-  8.   Devis, P. & Knuttinen, M. G. Deep venous throm-
             nancy. Cardiol Clin 30, 395–405 (2012).  bosis in pregnancy: incidence, pathogenesis and
          4.   POMP, E. R., LENSELINK, A. M., ROSENDAAL, F.   endovascular management. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther
                                                 7, S309–S319 (2017).
             R. & DOGGEN, C. J. M. Pregnancy, the postpartum
             period and prothrombotic defects: risk of venous   9.   McCollough, C. H. et al. Radiation Exposure and
             thrombosis in the MEGA study. Journal of Thrombo-  Pregnancy: When Should We Be Concerned? Radio-
             sis and Haemostasis 6, 632–637 (2008).  Graphics 27, 909–917 (2007).
          5.   Marik, P. E. & Plante, L. A. Venous Thromboembolic   10.  10.Wakeford, R. & Tawn, E. J. The meaning of low
             Disease and Pregnancy. New England Journal of   dose and low dose-rate. Journal of Radiological
             Medicine 359, 2025–2033 (2008).     Protection 30, 1–3 (2010).
          6.   Chan, W.-S., Spencer, F. A. & Ginsberg, J. S.   11.   Shaw, P., Duncan, A., Vouyouka, A. & Ozsvath, K.
             Anatomic distribution of deep vein thrombosis in   Radiation exposure and pregnancy. J Vasc Surg 53,
             pregnancy. CMAJ 182, 657–60 (2010).  28S-34S (2011).
                                                                              5
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8